Orbital Tube Welding
Understanding the basic principles behind orbital tube
welding may help you arrive more rapidly at the optimum weld procedure
for your specific application.
By Bernard Mannion and Jack Heinzman III
( Reproduced, Courtesy : Pro-Fusion. )
Orbital welding was first used in the 1960s, when the aerospace
industry recognized the need for a superior joining technique for
aerospace hydraulic lines. A mechanism was developed in which the arc from
a Tungsten electrode was rotated around the tubing weld joint. The arc
welding current was regulated with a control system thus automating the
entire process. The result was a more precision and reliable method than
the manual welding method it replaced.
In the early 1980s, Orbital welding became practical for many
industries when combination power supply/control systems were developed
that operated from 110 VAC. These systems were physically small enough to
be carried from place-to-place on a construction site for multiple
in-place welds. Modern day orbital welding systems offer computer control,
where welding parameters for a variety of applications can be stored in
memory and later called up for a specific application. Hence, the skills
of a certified welder are thus built into the welding system, producing
enormous numbers of identical welds and leaving significantly less room
for defects.
Orbital Welding Equipment
In the orbital welding process, tubes/pipes are clamped in place, and
an orbital weldhead rotates an electrode and electric arc around the weld
joint to make the required weld. An orbital welding system consists of a
power supply and an orbital weldhead.
The power supply/control system supplies and controls the welding
parameters according to the specific weld program created or recalled from
memory This supply provides the control parameters, the arc welding
current, the power to drive the motor in the weldhead, and switches the
shield gas(es) on/off as necessary.
Orbital weld heads are normally of the enclosed type, and provide an
inert atmosphere chamber that surrounds the weld joint. Standard enclosed
orbital weld heads are practical in welding tube sizes from 1/16 inch (1.6
mm) to 6 inches (152 mm) with wall thicknesses of up to .154 inches (3.9
mm). Larger diameters and wall thicknesses can be accommodated with open
style weld heads.
Reasons for Using Orbital Welding Equipment
Can
it save you money?
There are many reasons for using orbital welding equipment. The ability
to make high quality, consistent welds repeatedly, at a speed close to the
maximum weld speed, offer many benefits to the user:
- Productivity. An orbital welding system will drastically
outperform manual welders, many times paying for the cost of the orbital
equipment in a single job.
- Quality. The quality of a weld created by an orbital welding
system (with the correct weld program) will be superior to that of
manual welding. In applications such as semiconductor or pharmaceutical
tube welding, orbital welding is the only means to reach the weld
quality requirements.
- Consistency. Once a weld program has been established, an
orbital welding system can repeatedly perform the same weld hundreds of
times, eliminating the normal variability, inconsistencies, errors, and
defects of manual welding.
- Skill level. Certified welders are increasingly hard to find.
With orbital welding equipment, you don't need a certified welding
operator. All it takes is a skilled mechanic with some weld training.
- Versatility. Orbital welding may be used in applications
where a tube or pipe to be welded cannot be rotated or where rotation of
the part is not practical. In addition, orbital welding may be used in
applications where access space restrictions limit the physical size of
the welding device. Weld heads may be used in rows of boiler tubing,
where it would be difficult for a manual welder to use a welding torch
or view the weld joint.
Many other reasons exist for the use of orbital equipment over manual
welding. For example, applications where inspection of the internal weld
is not practical for each weld created. By making a sample weld coupon
that passes certification, the logic holds that if the sample weld is
acceptable, that successive welds created by an automatic machine with the
same input parameters should also be sound.
 |
| Standard enclosed orbital weld heads are
practical in welding tube sizes from 1/16 inch (1.6 mm) to 6 inches
(152 mm) with wall thicknesses of up to .154 inches (3.9 mm) Larger
diameters and wall thicknesses can be accommodated with open style
weld heads. |
General Guidelines for Orbital Tube Welding
For orbital welding in many precision or high purity applications, the
base material to be welded; the tube diameter(s); weld joint and part
fit-up requirements; shield gas type and purity; arc length; and Tungsten
electrode material, tip geometry, and surface condition may already be
written into a specification covering the application.
Each orbital welding equipment supplier differs slightly in recommended
welding practices and procedures. Where possible, follow the
recommendations of your orbital equipment supplier for equipment set-up
and use, especially in areas that pertain to warranty issues. Note that,
this section is only intended as a guideline for those applications where
no specification exists. The engineer responsible for the welding must
create the welding set-up, and derive the welding parameters, in order to
arrive at the optimum welding solution.
Welding Basics and Set-Up
The Physics of the GTAW Process
The orbital welding process uses the Gas Tungsten Arc Welding process
(GTAW), as the source of the electric arc that melts the base material and
forms the weld. In the GTAW process (also referred to as the Tungsten
Inert Gas process -- TIG) an electric arc is established between a
Tungsten electrode and the part to be welded. To start the arc, an RF or
high voltage signal (usually 3.5 to 7 KV) is used to break down (ionize)
the insulating properties of the shield gas and make it electrically
conductive in order to pass through a tiny amount of current. A capacitor
dumps current into this electrical path, which reduces the arc voltage to
a level where the power supply can then supply current for the arc. The
power supply responds to the demand and provides weld current to keep the
arc established. The metal to be welded is melted by the intense heat of
the arc and fuses together.
Material Weldability
The material selected varies according to the application and
environment the tubing must survive. The mechanical, thermal, stability,
and corrosion resistance requirements of the application will dictate the
material chosen. For complex applications, a significant amount of testing
will be necessary to ensure the long term suitability of the chosen
material from a functionality and cost viewpoint.
In general, the most commonly used 300 series stainless steels have a
high degree of weldability with the exception of 303/303SE which contain
additives for ease of machining. For hundred series stainless steels are
often weldable, but may require post weld heat treatment.
Accommodation must be made for the potential differences of different
material heats. The chemical composition of each heat batch number will
have minor differences in the concentration of alloying and trace
elements. These trace elements can vary the conductivity and melting
characteristics slightly for each heat. when a change in heat number is
make, a test coupon should be make for the new heat. Minor changes in
amperage may be required to return the weld to its original profile.
It is important that certain elements of the material be held to close
tolerances. Minor deviations in elements, such as sulfur, can vary the
fluid flow in the weld pool, completely changing the weld profile and
causing arc wander.
 |
| For orbital welding, the goal is to have the
minimum sufficient weld penetration to consistently weld through the
tube wall. |
 |
| How electrode tip geometry affects the weld
profile. |
Weld Joint Fit-Up
Weld joint fit-up is dependent on the weld specification requirements
on tube straightness, weld concavity, reinforcement, and drop through. If
no specification exists, the laws of physics will require that the molten
material flow and compensate for tube mismatch and any gap in the weld
joint.
Tubing is produced according to tolerances that are rigid or loose
according to the application for which the tube was purchased. It is
important that the wall thickness is repeatable at the weld joint from pat
to part. Differences in tube diameter or out-of-roundness will cause weld
joint mismatch and arc gap variations from one welding set up to another.
Tube and pipe end prep facing equipment is recommended in order to help
ensure end squareness and end flatness. Both the O.D. and O.D. should be
burr free with no chamfer.
When two tubes are butted together for welding, two of the main
considerations are mismatch and gaps. In general, the following rules
apply:
- Any gap should be less than five percent of the wall thickness. It
is possible to weld with gaps of up to 1- percent ( or greater) of wall
thickness, but the resultant quality of weld will suffer greatly, and
repeatability will also become a significant challenge.
- Wall thickness variations at the weld zone should be +/- five
percent of nominal wall thickness. Again, the laws of physics will allow
welding with mismatch of up to 25 percent of wall thickness if this is
the only challenge. Again, the resultant quality of weld will suffer
greatly, and repeatability will become an issue.
- Alignment mismatch (high-low) should be avoided by using engineering
stands and clamps to align the two tubes to be welded. This system also
removes the mechanical requirements of aligning the tubes from the
orbital weldhead.
 |
| Minor changes in sulfur content can change weld
pool flow characteristics with a dramatic effect on penetration (The
Maragoni Effect). |
Shield Gas(es)
An inert gas is required on the tube O.D. and I.D. during welding to
prevent the molten material from combining with the oxygen in the ambient
atmosphere. The objective of the welder should be to create a weld that
has zero tint at the weld zone I.D.
Argon is the most commonly used shield gas (for the O.D. of the tube
and the purge gas (for the I.D. of the tube). Helium is often used for
welding on copper material. Mixed gases, such as 98 percent Argon/two
percent Hydrogen; 95 percent Argon/five percent Hydrogen; 90 percent
Argon/10 percent Hydrogen; or 75 percent Helium/25 percent Argon may be
used when the wall thickness to be welded is heavy (.1" or above). Using
mixtures of 95 percent Argon/five percent Hydrogen is incompatible with
carbon steels and some exotic alloys, often causing hydrogen embrittlement
in the resultant weld. As a general rule, for simplicity and reduction of
shield gas cost, use 100 percent Argon gas.
Gas purity is dictated by the application. For high purity situations,
where the concern for micro-contamination is paramount, such as
semiconduction and pharmaceutical applications, the shield and purge gases
must minimize the heat tint that could otherwise be undesirable. In these
applications, ultra high purity gas or gas with a local purifier are
employed. For non-critical applications, commercial grade argon gas may be
used.
 |
| The combination of the electrode tip geometry
and shield gas can have a major effect on the weld penetration, weld
quality, welding speed, and electrode life.
|
 |
| Using pre-ground electrodes ensures that the
electrode material quality, tip geometry, and ground electrode
surface input to the welding process is constant.
|
Tungsten Electrode
The Tungsten welding electrode, the source of the welding arc, is one
of the most important elements of the welding system that is commonly
ignored by welding system users. Users continue to manually grind and
wonder why they produce inconsistent results. Whether in manual or
automatic welding, this is the area where manufacturing organizations can
improve the consistency of their welding output with minor effort.
Basically, the objective for the choice of Tungsten parameters is to
balance the benefits of a clean arc start and reduced arc wander with good
weld penetration and satisfactory electrode life.
Electrode Materials
For quite some time, Tungsten manufacturers have added an oxide to pure
Tungsten to improve the arc starting characteristics and longevity of pure
Tungsten electrodes. In the orbital welding industry, the most commonly
used electrode materials are two percent thoriated Tungsten and two
percent ceriated Tungsten.
| Many users of the TIG welding process
do not realize that the welding electrode they use contains Thorium,
a radioactive element added to the Tungsten.
|
Safety
The safety issues of Tungsten electrode material are now being looked
at more closely. Many users of the TIG welding process do not realize that
the welding electrode the use contains Thorium, a radioactive element
added to the Tungsten. While the radioactivity is of a low level, it
brings an issue of danger, especially with the radioactive dust that is
generated when grinding the electrodes to a point for welding.
Alternative, non-radioactive Tungsten materials are now available, such
as two percent ceriated electrodes, which often offer superior arc
welding. While these materials are commercially available they have been
largely ignored until recently.
 |
| A typical orbital tube weld. Note the pulsed
arc finish on the weld surface. |
Recommended Electrode Materials
Cerium, as a base material, has a lower work function than Thorium,
offering superior emission characteristics. So, not only do ceriated
electrodes offer an advance in electrode safety, they also improve the arc
starting ability of the orbital equipment. However, as mentioned earlier,
it is always best to follow the advice of your orbital equipment
manufacturer.
Electrode Tip Geometry
Given the ever-increasing weld quality requirements of the final weld,
more and more companies are looking for ways to ensure that their weld
quality is up to par. Consistency and repeatability are key to welding
applications. The shape and quality of the Tungsten electrode tip is also
being recognized as a vital process variable. Once a weld procedure has
been established, it is important that consistent electrode material, tip
geometry, and surface condition be used.
Welders should follow an equipment supplier's suggested procedures and
dimensions first, because they have usually performed a significant amount
of qualifying and troubleshooting work to optimize electrode preparation
for their equipment. However, where these specifications do not exist, or
the welder or engineer would like to change those settings to possibly
improve and optimize their welding, the following guidelines apply:
Electrode Taper
This is usually called out in degrees of included angle usually
anywhere between 14deg and 60deg). Below is a summary chart that
illustrates how different tapers offer different arc shapes and features:
| Sharper Electrodes |
Blunter Electrodes |
| Last less than blunt |
Last longer |
| Less weld penetration |
Better weld penetration |
| Wider arc shape |
Narrower arc shape |
| Handle less amperage |
Handle more amperage |
| Less arc wander |
Potential for more arc wander |
| More consistent arc |
Less consistent arc |
To demonstrate graphically how the taper selection will effect the size
of the weld bead and the amount of penetration, the drawing on page 20
show typical representations of the arc shape and resultant weld profile
for different tapers.
Electrode Tip Diameter
Grinding an electrode to a point is sometimes desirable for certain
applications, especially where arc starting is difficult or short duration
welds on small parts are performed. In most cases, however, it is best for
a welder to leave a flat spot or tip diameter at the end of the electrode.
This reduces erosion at the thin part of a point, and reduces the concern
that the tip may fall into the weld. Larger and smaller tip diameters
offer the following trade-offs:
| Smaller Tip |
Larger Tip |
| Easier to start |
Usually harder to start |
| Less arc wander |
More chance of arc wander |
| Less electrode life |
More electrode life |
| Less weld penetration |
More weld penetration |
Tungsten Electrode Grinder and Pre-Ground Electrode
Using electrodes pre-ground to requirements or a dedicated commercial
electrode grinder to provide electrode tip quality and consistency, offers
the following benefits to the user in their welding process:
- Improved arc starting, increased arc stability, and more consistent
weld penetration.
- Longer electrode life before electrode wear or contamination.
- Reduction of Tungsten shedding. This minimizes the possibility of
Tungsten inclusions in the weld.
- A dedicated electrode grinder helps ensure that the welding
electrodes will not become contaminated by residue or material left on a
standard shop grinder wheel.
- Tungsten electrode grinding equipment requires less skill to ensure
that the Tungsten electrode is ground correctly and with more
consistency.
Pre-Ground Electrodes
Rather than risk electrode radioactivity issues, and constantly endure
the variability of each operator grinding the electrodes with a slightly
different touch, many manufacturing organizations have chosen to purchase
electrodes pre-ground. Since a small difference in the dimensions of an
orbital electrode can produce a big difference in the weld results,
pre-ground electrodes are the preferred electrode choice to maintain the
consistency of your welding. This low-cost option ensures that the
electrode material quality, tip geometry, and ground electrode surface
input to the welding process is constant. Consult electrode charts or a
pre-ground electrode supplier to obtain the electrode diameter and tip
geometry that is most suitable for your welding application.
 |
| This weld profile shows a single level of weld
time. Orbital welding normally uses a minimum of four levels of weld
time, with each level decreasing in weld amperage as the tube heats
up during the welding process. |
image -
weld profile
Conclusion
In conclusion, the important points to remember are:
- Orbital welding has been used by many industries to improve the
quality and quantity of tube welding when compared to what can be
accomplished by manual welders.
- The effective cost of an employee computes to be significantly more
that just his base salary. The output of a \\$20 per hour skilled welder
actually costs over \\$72,000 per year (almost twice his yearly base
wage).
- If a complete orbital welding system costs between \\$15,000 and
\\$20,000 and can output over twice the amount of welding that a manual
welder can produce when the equipment will pay for itself in a matter of
months.
- Finally, the volume of welds that are produced by an automated
welding system will far exceed that of a manual welder. In addition to
weld quality improvements, this will bring two additional financial
benefits: One, increased output per day at lower cost. Two, lowered
scrap and rework costs due to improved weld consistency.
|
Orbital vs. Manual
Welding Can it save
you money?
WELDING
EQUIPMENT COST JUSTIFICATIONS
The full cost of employees can be shocking when all payroll
contributions and benefits are taken into consideration. The
following gives an overview of elements of employee payroll
that may be hidden costs now always considered in most
calculations. These considerations are important to use when
deciding whether or not purchasing welding equipment is a
viable option.
A welder's basic wages vary somewhat acording to geographic
location. Welders wages usually range from \\$15 to $25 per
hour. An average basic wage of \\$20 per hour was taken for the
purposes of the following calculations, however, you can
adjust the numbers accoringly based on your own salary
dictates.
ANNUAL
COST
| Welder's Wages |
| 1) |
Average Welder pay: \\$20.00 per hour Paid work
hours per year: 2,080 (40 hours per week x 52 weeks per
year) |
\\$ 41,6000.00 |
| Employer Payroll
Contributions |
| 2) |
Employer Social Security contributions - FICA @ 6.2
percent |
\\$ 2,579.20 |
| 3) |
Federal Medicare @ 1.45 percent |
\\$ 603.20 |
| 4) |
Federal Unemployment Tax - FUTA (0.26 percent,
with annual cap per person of \\$56.00 per year) |
\\$ 56.00 |
| 5) |
State Unemployment Insurance - SUI/SUTA (Varies
with employer and state 1.8 to 4.0 percent -- input your
state value) |
\\$748.80 |
| Annual Employee Base
Cost: |
\\$ 45,587.20 |
Other Direct Employee Costs
The daily rate of these costs must be calculated on
the annual employer base cost and not on the employees
wage cost. All calculations are based on a 260 day
working year (52 weeks per year with five days per
week). |
| 7) |
Paid national holidays: 10 days per year |
\\$ 1,600.00 |
| 8) |
Paid vacation time: 10 days per year |
\\$ 1,600.00 |
| 9) |
Allowable Time Off Days: average of seven days per
year Sick time, medical leave, medical/drug testing,
pregnancy, funeral/ bereavement time, military leave,
jury duty, witness duty, school activities, time off to
vote, etc. |
\\$ 1,120.00 |
| 10) |
Medical insurance (average is usually \\$120.00 per
month per employee) |
\\$1,440.00 |
| Incremented Employee
Cost: |
\\$ 51,347.20 |
Employee Direct overhead Costs
It is difficult to establish an exact figure for
these costs, but it is important to give some value to
their weight in order to arrive at a fair final employee
cost value. Taking a figure of approximately \\$20 per
week per employee gives an annual cost of \\$1,000. |
| 11) |
Pension plans - 401K, etc |
\\$ 1,000.00 |
| 12) |
Educational assistance |
| 13) |
Workman's compensation insurance |
| 14) |
Liability insurance required |
| 15) |
Other insurance's required. |
| 16) |
Physical plant size required per employee |
| 17) |
Plant maintenance required per employee |
| Incremented Employee
Cost: |
\\$ 52,347.20 |
Indirect Employee Overhead
Costs Again, it is difficult to establish an
exact figure for these costs, but it is important to
give some value to their weight in order to arrive at a
fair final employee cost value. Taking a figure of
approximately \\$20 per week per employee gives an annual
cost of \\$1,000. |
| 18) |
Supervisor and management costs |
\\$ 1,000.00 |
| 19) |
Human resources/personnel dept costs |
| 20) |
Training costs |
| 21) |
Cost of required equipment per person |
| Incremented Employee
Cost: |
\\$ 53,347.20 |
Manual Operation (employee-related)
Costs These are costs associated with manual
operations that most likely would be reduced with a more
mechanized operation. Again, it is difficult to
establish an exact figure for these costs, but it is
important to give some value to their weight in order to
arrive at a fair final employee cost value. Taking a
figure of approximately \\$20 per week per employee gives
an annual cost of \\$1,000. |
| 22) |
Additional quality control costs |
\\$ 1,000.00 |
| 23) |
Reject, scrap, and rework costs |
| 24) |
Customer relations, if bad parts shipped |
| 25) |
Costs associated with customer use of a bad
part. |
| Incremented Employee
Cost: |
\\$ 54,347.20 |
| (Approximately 1.3 times base
employee cost) |
Employee Output Efficiency
This is the issue that contributes to the highest
cost factor of employees, when compared to purchasing
and using an automated welding system. No employee works
at 100 percent speed for eight hours. Batch setup times,
clarification of orders, routine maintenance, and
occasional output checks for quality, lunch breaks,
coffee breaks, bathroom breaks, human socializing, and
fatigue all contribute to limiting the output of an
employee to an expected maximum. If an employer receives
even 75 percent of an employee's potential output, they
should consider themselves fortunate. When compared to
subcontracting some of the manufacturing operations,
this effectively increases the final employee cost by a
factor of 1/.75 = 1.33. This brings the effective
employee total cost to just over \\$72,000 per year.
|
|

About the IIW /
Mumbai Branch /
Other Branches /
Coming Events /
Technical Lectures
Mumbai Weldnet /
Trends in welding /
Related Websites /
IIW Forum /
Feedback /
Home
